<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Progress Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprogressreport.co.nz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz</link>
	<description>A New Zealand look at progressive politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 lessons for Labour from Obama 2012 by Patrick Leyland</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/11/11/5-lessons-for-labour-from-obama-2012/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Leyland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=870#comment-863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some really good points there. By focussing on the Republican base in bible/rust belt America, they totally ignored *some* parts of the growing middle class (and the segmentation there is where it gets really interesting), and the increasing Latino and African American vote. There are lots of different ways that could be interpreted for a New Zealand perspective, but anyone who just looks at it with an ethnic perspective is missing the point.

Your second point about candidate selection is also very interesting. The most watched of the Democratic Senatorial challengers, Elizabeth Warren, certainly used her outsider status to great advantage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some really good points there. By focussing on the Republican base in bible/rust belt America, they totally ignored *some* parts of the growing middle class (and the segmentation there is where it gets really interesting), and the increasing Latino and African American vote. There are lots of different ways that could be interpreted for a New Zealand perspective, but anyone who just looks at it with an ethnic perspective is missing the point.</p>
<p>Your second point about candidate selection is also very interesting. The most watched of the Democratic Senatorial challengers, Elizabeth Warren, certainly used her outsider status to great advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 lessons for Labour from Obama 2012 by askewednz</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/11/11/5-lessons-for-labour-from-obama-2012/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askewednz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 05:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=870#comment-860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there were a few other teachable lessons for NZ Labour too.

Namely that playing solely to the base and margins cost the Republicans hugely. The membership of the Republicans were enough to ensure Romney had few likely or obvious pathways to the White House. Hopefully Labour will reflect on that here.

Also candidate selection was huge for the Democrats. They had good solid credible candidates who in many of the key senate races, were up against partisan nutjobs. Another good lesson I would have thought.

And finally, clarity of what the Democrat/Obama brand was. Love him or loath him, you knew what Obama stood for, what his values were and what you were voting for. Labour&#039;s brand here is as confused as it has ever been.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there were a few other teachable lessons for NZ Labour too.</p>
<p>Namely that playing solely to the base and margins cost the Republicans hugely. The membership of the Republicans were enough to ensure Romney had few likely or obvious pathways to the White House. Hopefully Labour will reflect on that here.</p>
<p>Also candidate selection was huge for the Democrats. They had good solid credible candidates who in many of the key senate races, were up against partisan nutjobs. Another good lesson I would have thought.</p>
<p>And finally, clarity of what the Democrat/Obama brand was. Love him or loath him, you knew what Obama stood for, what his values were and what you were voting for. Labour&#8217;s brand here is as confused as it has ever been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 lessons for Labour from Obama 2012 by Dan</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/11/11/5-lessons-for-labour-from-obama-2012/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=870#comment-858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, predictive - &#039;especially&#039; should read &#039;except&#039; - which changes the proposition of my comment but I was posting it from a damn tablet, with damn predictive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, predictive &#8211; &#8216;especially&#8217; should read &#8216;except&#8217; &#8211; which changes the proposition of my comment but I was posting it from a damn tablet, with damn predictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 lessons for Labour from Obama 2012 by Dan</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/11/11/5-lessons-for-labour-from-obama-2012/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=870#comment-857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so true - especially about the debates.  The number of people who went to me after Obama&#039;s first debate and said &quot;That&#039;s it, Romney&#039;s got it&quot; surprised me.  For a start, it is a debate, on television during prime time - the only people watching it are probably registered with either the GOP or the Democrats already.  Secondly, the live TV format for debates lacks credibility to the point where anyone who knows anything about the issues at stake (see my first point) sees the debates as glib side-shows to real campaigning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true &#8211; especially about the debates.  The number of people who went to me after Obama&#8217;s first debate and said &#8220;That&#8217;s it, Romney&#8217;s got it&#8221; surprised me.  For a start, it is a debate, on television during prime time &#8211; the only people watching it are probably registered with either the GOP or the Democrats already.  Secondly, the live TV format for debates lacks credibility to the point where anyone who knows anything about the issues at stake (see my first point) sees the debates as glib side-shows to real campaigning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A thought for today by Katie</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/08/29/a-thought-for-today/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=852#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I LOVE this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The politics of fear by Patrick Leyland</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/08/25/the-politics-of-fear/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Leyland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=838#comment-778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marian Hobbs left this message on my Facebook about Michael D. Higgins. It was too good not to share...

&quot;I love Michael D. When I was Min Broadcasting we invited him to NZ. he spoke of how as Min of arts he set in place the music quotas that we imitated that promoted Irish music and great bands. I love this fearless man. and he has had his impact on NZ.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marian Hobbs left this message on my Facebook about Michael D. Higgins. It was too good not to share&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I love Michael D. When I was Min Broadcasting we invited him to NZ. he spoke of how as Min of arts he set in place the music quotas that we imitated that promoted Irish music and great bands. I love this fearless man. and he has had his impact on NZ.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organisational review: A very quick thought on regional hubs and the party vote by James Caygill</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/08/21/organisational-review-a-very-quick-thought-on-regional-hubs-and-the-party-vote/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Caygill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=828#comment-771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I said on Trevor&#039;s Facebook page:

I disagree with you Patrick

Form should follow function. The Party vote is the single most important thing under MMP. We should structure ourselves to get it. Electorate wins will follow if we do.

In that sense I&#039;m critical that the review didn&#039;t go far enough. Our structure, still fundamentally one for FPP, remains based at the electorate level which makes little sense for issue and party vote campaigning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on Trevor&#8217;s Facebook page:</p>
<p>I disagree with you Patrick</p>
<p>Form should follow function. The Party vote is the single most important thing under MMP. We should structure ourselves to get it. Electorate wins will follow if we do.</p>
<p>In that sense I&#8217;m critical that the review didn&#8217;t go far enough. Our structure, still fundamentally one for FPP, remains based at the electorate level which makes little sense for issue and party vote campaigning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organisational review: A very quick thought on regional hubs and the party vote by Sam Durbin (@samdurbin)</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/08/21/organisational-review-a-very-quick-thought-on-regional-hubs-and-the-party-vote/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Durbin (@samdurbin)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=828#comment-769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree to a point.

I think that the silo effect of LECs embeds these cultural problems into structure, and that breaking down the silos should hopefully help prompt a cultural change. But you&#039;re right in that cultural change should be the end goal, structural change will be a step on that path.

There are a number of issues that the org. review has revealed and the more i think about them, the more often i come to the conclusion they are cultural problems. The seemingly yawning divide between caucus and the membership seems like one salient example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree to a point.</p>
<p>I think that the silo effect of LECs embeds these cultural problems into structure, and that breaking down the silos should hopefully help prompt a cultural change. But you&#8217;re right in that cultural change should be the end goal, structural change will be a step on that path.</p>
<p>There are a number of issues that the org. review has revealed and the more i think about them, the more often i come to the conclusion they are cultural problems. The seemingly yawning divide between caucus and the membership seems like one salient example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad news for Colin Craig by Joel Rowan (@RealJoelRowan)</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/08/11/bad-news-for-colin-craig/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Rowan (@RealJoelRowan)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=821#comment-749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subtitle for this post: &quot;Good news for New Zealand&quot; - lets keep him and his fundamentalist friends away. I doubt there are 5% of New Zealanders out there who will get so upset by gay couples being allowed to marry (given Civil Unions are already a recognised part of society) as to switch their vote to his party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subtitle for this post: &#8220;Good news for New Zealand&#8221; &#8211; lets keep him and his fundamentalist friends away. I doubt there are 5% of New Zealanders out there who will get so upset by gay couples being allowed to marry (given Civil Unions are already a recognised part of society) as to switch their vote to his party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marriage equality &#8211; lobbying tips by Huff</title>
		<link>http://theprogressreport.co.nz/2012/07/30/marriage-equality-lobbying-tips/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprogressreport.co.nz/?p=814#comment-720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://huff863.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/5606/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Smile Like The Sun&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
You catch more bees with honey than vinegar,&quot; 
Ssshhh! I know I&#039;ve got the quote wrong but we&#039;re trying to persuade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://huff863.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/5606/" rel="nofollow">A Smile Like The Sun</a> and commented:<br />
You catch more bees with honey than vinegar,&#8221;<br />
Ssshhh! I know I&#8217;ve got the quote wrong but we&#8217;re trying to persuade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
